President Putin ‘probably’ approved Litvinenko murder

President Putin ‘probably’ approved Litvinenko murder

Former Russian Agent Poisoned In London

January 21 2015

The murder of ex-Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko in 2006 in the UK was “probably” approved by President Vladimir Putin, an inquiry has found.

Mr Putin is likely to have signed off the poisoning of Mr Litvinenko with polonium-210 in part due to personal “antagonism” between the pair, it said.

Home Secretary Theresa May said the murder was a “blatant and unacceptable” breach of international law.

But the Russian Foreign Ministry said the public inquiry was “politicised”.

It said: “We regret that the purely criminal case was politicised and overshadowed the general atmosphere of bilateral relations.”

What Litvinenko report means for UK

Key findings of the public inquiry

Who was Alexander Litvinenko?

Who are the Litvinenko murder suspects?

Story of a perplexing murder

Dmitry Peskov, Mr Putin’s spokesman, said Moscow’s official response to the report will happen through “diplomatic channels”, the Russian news agency Interfax was quoted as saying.

Prime Minister David Cameron said the UK would have to go on having “some sort of relationship with them [Russia]” because of the Syria crisis, but it would be done with “clear eyes and a very cold heart”.

Media captionDavid Cameron said the murder of Alexander Litvinenko had been shown to be “state-sponsored”

The long-awaited report into Mr Litvinenko’s death found that two Russian men – Andrei Lugovoi and Dmitry Kovtun – deliberately poisoned the 43-year-old in London in 2006 by putting the radioactive substance polonium-210 into his drink at a hotel.

Sir Robert Owen, the public inquiry chairman, said he was “sure” Mr Litvinenko’s murder had been carried out by the two men and that they were probably acting under the direction of Moscow’s FSB intelligence service, and approved by the organisation’s chief, Nikolai Patrushev, as well as the Russian president.

He said Mr Litvinenko’s work for British intelligence agencies, his criticism of the FSB and Mr Putin, and his association with other Russian dissidents were possible motives for his killing.

‘Send a message’

There was also “undoubtedly a personal dimension to the antagonism” between Mr Putin and Mr Litvinenko, he said.

The use of polonium-210 was “at the very least a strong indicator of state involvement” as it had to be made in a nuclear reactor, the report said.

The inquiry heard evidence that Mr Litvinenko may have been consigned to a slow death from radiation to “send a message”.

What is polonium-210?

The teapot where traces of polonium-210 were discovered
Image captionThe teapot where traces of polonium-210 were discovered

Giving a statement to the House of Commons, Mrs May said Mr Cameron would raise the findings with President Putin at “the next available opportunity”.

She said the UK would impose asset freezes on Mr Lugovoi and Mr Kovtun and that international arrest warrants for the pair remained in place. They both deny killing Mr Litvinenko.

Both men are wanted in the UK for questioning, but Russia has refused to extradite them.

Media captionMarina Litvinenko: ‘Russian spies must be expelled from UK’

Speaking earlier outside the High Court, Mr Litvinenko’s widow, Marina, said she was “very happy” that “the words my husband spoke on his deathbed when he accused Mr Putin have been proved by an English court”.

She urged the UK government to expel all Russian intelligence operatives, impose economic sanctions on Moscow and impose a travel ban on Mr Putin.

The view from Moscow

Andrei Lugovoi, left, and Dmitry KovtunImage copyrightAP
Image captionAndrei Lugovoi, left, and Dmitry Kovtun pictured in Moscow, in 2007

By the BBC’s Oleg Boldyrev

For years Moscow rejected allegations of high-level involvement in the murder of Alexander Litvinenko.

The fact President Putin himself is now associated with this assassination has not changed anything.

Taking their lead from Robert Owen’s use of the words “high probability”, the second tier of the Russian establishment, mainly Kremlin-loyalist MPs, are dismissing the entire report as a politically-based fabrication.

Russians on social media are making fun of its conclusions by using the hashtag “PutinProbablyApproved” in Russian – that is #ПутинВозможноОдобрил – to include all manner of crimes.

One Russian MP, Nikolai Kovalev, himself an ex-FSB boss, pointed out relations between Moscow and London would not be harmed by the report as there was no room for making them any worse.

How Russian media reported the Litvinenko inquiry

Responding to the report, Mr Lugovoi, who is now a politician in Russia, said the accusations against him were “absurd”, the Russian news agency Interfax was quoted as saying.

“As we expected, there were no surprises,” he said.

“The results of the investigation made public today yet again confirm London’s anti-Russian position, its blinkeredness and the unwillingness of the English to establish the true reason of Litvinenko’s death.”

Mr Kovtun, now a businessman in Russia, said he would not comment on the report until he got more information about its contents, Interfax reported.

‘Harm relations’

London’s Metropolitan Police said the investigation into the “cold and calculated murder” remained ongoing.

Alexander Yakovenko, the Russian ambassador in the UK, said Russia would not accept any decisions reached in secret and based on evidence not tested in open court.

The length of time taken to come to these conclusions led them to believe it was “a whitewash of British security services’ incompetence”, he said.

Mr Yakovenko said these events “can’t help but harm our bilateral relations”.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said he did not have “any actions” to announce following the inquiry’s findings. “But I certainly wouldn’t rule out future steps,” he said.


Alexander Litvinenko, pictured at a news conference in Moscow in 1998, when he was an officer of Russia's state security service FSBImage copyrightReuters
Image captionAlexander Litvinenko at a news conference in Moscow in 1998, when he was an officer of Russia’s state security service FSB

By BBC security correspondent, Gordon Corera

The conclusions of this inquiry are stronger than many expected in pointing the finger at Vladimir Putin personally.

The evidence behind that seems to have come from secret intelligence heard in closed session.

Saying that Alexander Litvinenko was killed because he was an enemy of the Russian state will raise pressure on the British government to take real action – the steps taken nearly a decade ago were only limited in scope.

That may pose difficulties given the importance of Russia’s role in the Middle East, but without tough action people may ask if the Russian government has been allowed to get away with what has been described as an act of nuclear terrorism on the streets of London.

Mr Litvinenko fled to the UK in 2000, claiming persecution. He was granted asylum and gained British citizenship several years later.

In the years before his death, he worked as a writer and journalist, becoming a strong critic of the Kremlin.

Russian President Vladimir PutinImage copyrightReuters
Image captionRussian President Vladimir Putin “probably” approved the killing, the report says

It is believed he also worked as a consultant for MI6, specialising in Russian organised crime.

The inquiry heard from 62 witnesses in six months of hearings and was shown secret intelligence evidence about Mr Litvinenko and his links with British intelligence agencies.

The Litvinenko case

Media captionThe son of murdered Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko gives his first television interview
  • 23 November 2006 – Mr Litvinenko dies three weeks after having tea with former agents Andrei Lugovoi and Dmitri Kovtun in London
  • 22 May 2007 – Britain’s director of public prosecutions decides Mr Lugovoi should be charged with his murder
  • 5 July 2007 – Russia refuses to extradite Mr Lugovoi, saying its constitution does not allow it
  • May-July 2013 – The inquest into Mr Litvinenko’s death is delayed as the coroner decides a public inquiry would be preferable – but ministers rule out the request
  • 11 February 2014 – High Court rules the Home Office was wrong to rule out an inquiry before the outcome of an inquest
  • January 2015 – Public inquiry begins

Long road to the truth for Litvinenko family

  • More on this story

    • Litvinenko report: David Cameron condemns Russia over ex-spy
      7 hours ago
    • Litvinenko inquiry: Key findings
      21 January 2016
    • Litvinenko suspects Andrei Lugovoi and Dmitry Kovtun
      21 January 2016
    • Family’s long road to truth
      21 January 2016
    • Alexander Litvinenko: Profile of murdered Russian spy
      21 January 2016
    • Video What did the inquiry conclude?
      21 January 2016
    • What is polonium-210?
      31 July 2015

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.